Letter to New Filipino Bishop in Love with Judas Iscariot

Dear Modernist Clergyman, Pablo David, of The Philippines,

Yet again, a member of the Bergoglian Antichurch (yourself), wishes to promote sacrilege by passing out the Eucharist to anybody, while defending Jesus’ infamous betrayer, Judas Iscariot. You had some interesting (ridiculous) comments during your homily for the episcopal consecration of Elias Ayuban a few days ago.

“Look, the one who received the first morsel of bread was Judas. It was Jesus’ way of transforming a meal of betrayal into a meal of forgiveness. We are all like broken bowls ourselves. But the good news is—there is no brokenness that cannot be healed by the precious blood of the lamb.”

While there is indeed no brokenness beyond forgiveness, Judas Iscariot DID NOT SEEK FORGIVENESS, something you and your Bergoglian colleagues always ignore. Alas, this isn’t the first time you’ve advanced the sneaky pro-Judas rhetoric. As Rorate Caeli noticed, this is a continuation of your previous “Judas love,” going back to 2021 . . . 

“Instead, it is the Gospels themselves that say Judas was under the spell of Satan—the real adversary, the real enemy of Jesus.”

Mr. David, if you understood the reality of demonic possession, then you would know that it requires some type of consent from the person possessed. In other words, Judas WAS NOT an innocent victim of Satan, but rather a willing accomplice. Moreover, since Judas never repented, he suffers the miserable companionship of Satan for all eternity in the pits of Hell.

Disastrous Homily Topic: “Judas Wasn’t So Bad”

We should wonder about the timing of this pro-Judas subject matter. Why waste the precious occasion of episcopal ordination to preach about the worst bishop of all time in such a way as to “rehabilitate” his well-deserved, treacherous reputation? 

Perhaps you did not notice how the Council of Trent specifically affirms that Judas is in Hell (stating that his apostleship “only brought him everlasting destruction”). Since this is true, coming from an authentic dogmatic council (not Vatican II), why would you argue something contrary? What good is it to attempt to rehabilitate somebody the Church has infallibly declared to be in Hell?

Those who reject the instructions of dogmatic councils are anathema to the Catholic religion.

In fact, it would be easier to burn an entire city to the ground and reanimate all the ashes back into buildings than it would be to remedy Judas Iscariot’s reputation. Although we should never rejoice over another’s damnation, it must be clear that Judas shall not return from that fiery inferno.

That’s all I have to say regarding all that Judas Iscariot business. However, since I have your attention, there was something else I noticed about you . . .

Pablo David → Why Are You Wearing the Bergoglio/Bernardin Necklace?

Mr. David, why do you wear such a hideous pectoral cross (if it can even be called that)?

I always thought the purpose of that episcopal ornamentation was to announce one’s sacrificial devotion to Christ crucified; wearing it close to the heart. That used to be the entire purpose of being a bishop or cardinal: preaching the Gospel, shepherding large flocks, and a willingness to die for Christ. Yet this version is almost intentionally ugly, featuring a vague/grotesque image of Jesus Christ on the Cross, but not crucified. 

For anyone who’s new to this suspicious piece of jewelry, and its meaning, please review this article on how it signifies Antichrist. Don’t forget that its usage dates back to at least the wicked prelate, Joseph Bernardin, probable perpetrator of a Luciferian Enthronement several decades ago.

“Oh, but it’s supposed to be Jesus carrying lambs like a loving shepherd.”

That’s what the modernists would like us to believe. However, it’s a naïve assessment for sure.

Even if we grant the benefit of the doubt, regarding the necklace’s “shepherd and lambs” intentions, it’s the worst possible rendition. Most of the lambs resemble hyenas, the dove looks like it was just shot and is collapsing in a tailspin, and whoever’s holding the lambs appears to be mummified.

Then, as several of us have mentioned elsewhere, the Bergoglio/Bernardin “pectoral cross” looks eerily similar to the Osiris Rising pose, made famous by Aleister Crowley. Several other celebrities strike this pose often as well. I don’t understand how we would mistake something Luciferian for Catholic artwork.

Judas Iscariot – Traditionally Reviled by True Filipino Catholics

Finally, I thought Filipinos (those few who remain loyal to Holy Mother Church) had a delightful devotion to dishonoring terrible thieves, like Judas Iscariot? You even mentioned it some of your previous writing:

“When I was still a little boy, I remember witnessing the gruesome traditional ritual of hanging an effigy of Judas Iscariot on Black Saturday morning. The whole thing was like a medieval public execution.”

Leaving aside how you seem to conflate Judas’ suicide with public execution, this and other rituals reflect the Filipino commitment to calling a thief a thief. Modernists, like yourself, refuse to make such explicit statements. Could this be because you wish to mitigate the severity of sin and pretend evil does not exist?

Thanks be to God, there are Filipinos who cling to their devotions and Traditional Catholicism. I hope they do not become discouraged in the face of your “nice guy” dilution of the Catholic religion.

As I understand it, one of the worst insults one could receive (when caught lying) would be: “Hudas! Barabas! Hestas!” That’s because faithful Filipinos (not modernists) know we indeed have enemies, and they’re JUST the demons in Hell. Let us always decry the horrible betrayals by Judas, Barrabas, and Gestas (all traitors at Calvary), and never attempt to rehabilitate or imitate them.

Conclusion → Filipinos Should Ignore Antichurch Clerics. They Aren’t Catholic.

I wish I could offer gentler words to Mr. David, but his modernism and stealth aggression against the Church eliminates the opportunity. It is precisely this scandalous preaching and writing, which has been responsible for driving so many Filipinos away from authentic Catholicism.

Lamentable as that may be, I encourage my Filipino friends to stay far away from this non-Catholic member of the Bergoglian Antichurch. We will be held accountable for whether we allow ourselves to stumble over the scandals set to trap us by men like Pablo David, Tucho Fernandez, and Jorge Bergoglio.

In the meantime, as usual, all Catholics should pray for the Holy Spirit to guide them from false shepherds and toward Traditional Catholicism. The best ways to accomplish this are by praying the Rosary (all 15 decades every day), meditating on the eternity of Heaven and Hell, confession, and detachment from the world.

God bless the Philippines.

St. Lorenzo Ruiz, pray for us.