“It is the man of God, that was disobedient to the mouth of the Lord, and the Lord hath delivered him to the lion, and he hath torn him, and killed him according to the word of the Lord, which he spoke to him.
–3 Kings: 13:26
Yes, if one follows this Antipope “Leo,” then one can expect similar treatment as the disobedient man from 3 Kings. I suggest we not allow ourselves to fall for this snare or trip right into the lion’s den the way so many did with the previous “Oily Father.”
Here are some early observations regarding the arrival of Antipope Robert Francis Prevost.
- You will see the acceleration of the ridiculous right-versus-left dichotomy, which is still nothing but a distraction. The right-wing will insist that the Deep State installed Prevost as a reaction to Donald Trump’s “evil anti-immigration” policies. Prevost’s ascension, as a Peruvian-American, will be interpreted as the “Catholic Church” opposing the American Empire’s immigration stance by selecting an American ethnic minority. Prevost is already on record opposing Vice President J.D. Vance (who I call the Grim Veeper, considering how he handled the last antipope). Granted, this assumes, in typical narcissistic fashion, that the entire world revolves around Donald Trump, Americans, and our stupid race wars and politics. Reality is much deeper and more comprehensive than American soap operas and pro wrestling disguised as politics. The false dichotomy of left-versus-right is, however, a massive distraction from the real problem. As I and others have mentioned several times, the real battle is between Church versus Antichurch not nationalists and conservatives versus “the global left.”
- Prevost will be a very titular head of the Synodal Antichurch. It’s preposterous to suggest that some random boomer would arise from nowhere to lead the modernists in the Vatican. Remember, these radical Anti-Catholics are the ones who have inverted the papal supremacy enshrined by Vatican I, replacing it with something that goes by various names: “collegiality, synodalism, or conciliarism.” It’s all rule-by-committee; not a vertical monarchy.
- Like virtually the entire College of Cardinals, Prevost has received accusations of concealing sexual abuse among his clerical subordinates.
- What about the name, Leo? Might it signify how the Ape of the Church will deliver the real Church “into the mouth of the lion”? What kind lion will this “Leo” be, anyway? Papal names are significant and rarely drawn from a hat. In order to connect himself with the last legitimate Leo, Pope Leo XIII, this fake Leo will mutilate every authentic interpretation of Rerum Novarum, supplanting it with Latin-American-style communism. Expect to hear a lot of phony, mumbly gibberish about social justice; worse than under Bergoglio. Furthermore, it’s difficult to imagine that anybody who made his way up the ranks in the Latin American facade of Catholicism could be anything but an adherent to Liberation Theology.
- He’s connected to the odious Leo “Cardinal” Suenens’ lineage of Belgian priests. The man who ordained Prevost was consecrated a bishop by Suenens (AKA the Godfather of the “Catholic Charismatic Renewal” and notable perpetrator of Vatican II).
- We cannot ignore Prevost’s potential connections to the infamous and satanic atmosphere of “Catholic Chicago,” where he would have received early formation. He also came and went from the Windy City several times, returning in 1998 to be head of the Augustinians there. How much exposure would he have had to Cardinal Joseph Bernardin, the former “kingmaker” and co-presider over a Luciferian Enthronement? Then there is an array of other unsavory Chicagoans who Prevost certainly would have encountered, if not befriended. He may have been too young to have met Saul Alinsky, but he’s certainly been close with Blase Cupich and is only about six years older than Barack Obama.
- Prevost sure has come almost out of nowhere. Mark Docherty pointed out (a day before the conclave) how Robert Prevost had suddenly become the darling of both the Catholic media and the loathsome New York Times. Anti-Catholic villains, such as Austen Ivereigh and James Martin, SJ, also indicated their preference for Prevost at almost exactly the same time. We know quite well how easy it is for our enemies to grab these puppets out of obscurity and push them to the moon in little or no time. I can recall another fellow from Chicago who enjoyed such a near-meteoric rise.
- As Fr. Paul Kramer reminds us, recall the words of Pope Paul IV: “A heretic, even if unanimously elected, is no pope.” This seems quite apropos, considering it is quite possible that 90% of the College of Cardinals may not even be Catholic, and therefore especially prone to elect a heretic.
- Yes, of course the conclave didn’t select Dracula. After all, then you’d know who’s castle to avoid. Our modernist enemies are always much more stealth and adept than that. Believe it or not, many “traditionalists” will fall for the lie that Prevost is a “moderate.”
- Many controlled-opposition “traditionalists” (i.e., Michael Matt, who unites the clowns) will look for desperate silver linings with Prevost. “Well, you see, he wore the special red cape on the loggia this time, unlike Bergoglio. That’s pretty cool, eh?” Moreover, all the usual gas lighters will accuse you of scary, schizophrenic schism if you oppose this new antipope. Prepare yourself for that.
- Interesting Historical Facts Regarding May 8th: Three popes have died on this date (all from the first millennium). Today also marks the 304th anniversary of the election of Pope Innocent III. It is also the 141st birthday of the miserable Harry Truman, the only man to order the launching of nuclear weapons (secretive launches notwithstanding).
- Make sure your priests know not to commemorate Robert at Mass. This would be the height of stupidity and false obedience at this point.
Conclusion – God Stills Loves Us
“Give praise to the Lord, for he is good: for his mercy endureth for ever.”
–Psalm 117:1
Let us not allow this horrible news to extinguish our Easter joy in this wonderful season. It should, instead, remind us of Jesus Christ’s incomprehensible love for all of us.
No other religion has such a god who would condescend to man’s level AND die a horrific death for the benefit of man. If we didn’t know God loved us, we would have to conclude that sending Jesus Christ to die for us was completely irrational; yet we know better. So, let us give thanks for this new tribulation, yet another antipope, the further crucifixion of the Church (which leads to resurrection), and content ourselves with God’s permissive will.
What else would you do, anyway? Cry and capitulate to despair?
I’ll tell you what you should do, because Heaven commands it: Pray the Rosary every day (all 15 decades) in reparation for the sins against Our Lady’s Immaculate Heart. Someday God will send a pope who will consecrate Russia to Mary’s Heart, but it may not happen until everything appears hopeless.
Certainly, we at least seem to be much closer . . .

2 Comments