Dear Chris Jackson, Frank Walker, and all other Forever Trumpers,
So, it appears that our intrepid leader, Donald Trump, Emperor of the Western Hemisphere, has announced his willingness to negotiate a ceasefire, thereby averting total chaos and mayhem in Iran. Some folks believe this is another brilliant example of Trump’s 4D-chessmanship, whereas others think the old Don got cold feet again (Trump Always Chickens Out; TACO).
I’m not so sure, but there is one fascinating component I wish you would address for me.
We see that his Imperial Majesty decided, via his Truth Social account, to announce his willingness to explore a two-week ceasefire, offering more time for a negotiated re-opening of the Strait of Hormuz, supposedly assuaging the whole “civilization ending” WW3-ignition scenario.
If this is so, and he’s posting this announcement on the same Truth Social account he used for the “Praise Allah” genocidal comment, then does that mean the previous message WASN’T fake. After all, as I understood it, the Forever Trumpers were convinced that the message was inauthentic, the result of a hijacked account (or some dastardly “AI” creation).
Let’s assume that message was fake (and that somehow the new ceasefire message is automatically real, for some leap-of-fath reason). Wouldn’t a prudent statesman, of which you believe Trump to be, address the chicanery of the previous fake message issued by the same account? To my knowledge, he has not done so, not on any platform, digital or live press conference.
Why hasn’t your fearless leader attempted this?
I thought politicians were among the most eager to dismiss “fake” messages and “leaks” as fast as possible, especially when it could empower their opponents. Trump was just talking about staff leaks the other day, regarding the disclosure of classified information on the rescue mission involving a downed fighter aircraft. He even threatened to jail journalists over it (he does a lot of threatening in his old age).
Wouldn’t Trump, who cares an awful lot about his image and never misses the chance to dismiss fake news, be the FIRST person to eliminate obvious sabotage? Did any of his press staff say anything about the “fake” comments praising Allah and killing every last Iranian?
It seems like that would be high on the Don’s to-do list. Then again, maybe Trump and his loyal Forever Trumpers (like Chris “AI writes my articles” Jackson) are okay with threatening to eliminate 90 million people, mostly civilians. Maybe it’s okay to pretend you might do it just to gain an upper hand over a frightened opponent (which is still bearing false witness, by the way).
You decide.
I have an additional question for Frank Walker.
Yesterday, you posted a story with a hyperlink that referred to Taylor Marshall as a “new Never Trumper.” Now, this might be me being too much of a grammarian, but doesn’t that imply a contradiction in terms? How can one be a NEVER Trumper (your favorite term for us all, nowadays) if he had previously supported the president? Wouldn’t that make him a “No-longer Trumper” or something along those lines?
I’m starting to think you toss these terms around without thinking them through all the way. Well, I guess things get busy and we don’t always have time to post everything carefully.
At any rate, I didn’t mean to distract Frank, Chris, or the other 24-7-Leo-beat journalists from their difficult jobs of writing about the same nonsense all the time. I know you guys have the important duty of reminding everybody (over and over and over and over again) that “LEO IS BAD. HE’S DAMN BAD!” Permit me not to distract you any further.
Otherwise, have a blessed Easter, pray the Rosary every day (especially for our enemies, like Donald Trump), and may we all sleep well enough at night knowing that our eternal destinies do not depend on the stupid machinations of Trump, Robert Prevost, Beebee Netanyahu, or any other character, real or imagined.
Glory to God forever and ever.
Catholics Aren't Zombies! 