Bergoglio Dossier: Why There is No ‘Pope Francis’

An antipope is a false claimant to the Holy See in opposition to the canonically elected pope. For the first time in several centuries, the Catholic Church faces the scourge of an imposter, Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who fashions himself “Pope Francis.” This pamphlet will provide evidence and context clues for deciphering his antipapacy.

If Bergoglio is not the pope, is the Church currently without a pope (a vacant See)?

Yes, as of December 31, 2022, the See of Peter became vacant. As of this pamphlet’s publication, the Church has entered an interregnum period (between reigns or between popes) following the death of Pope Benedict XVI (who reigned from 2005 to 2022). Neither before nor after his death has there been a “Francis Pontificate.” I’ll explain how Benedict’s resignation was invalid because of possible coercion, but most especially since it contains “substantial errors,” according to the Catholic Code of Canon Law.

Why does this topic matter?

Perhaps you’re thinking: “I’m a faithful Catholic regardless of the Roman Pontiff’s identity” or “Why should I care who’s the pope when I could ignore this and go about my merry way?” Well, you could do that . . . if you’re a protestant. In fact, that’s a defining characteristic of protestantism: a complete antipathy to the notion of a Vicar of Christ on Earth.

Are you a protestant? If not, then you have a duty and right to know the true pope, the holder of the Petrine office, as instituted by Jesus Christ (see Matthew 16). Also, let’s be perfectly frank. Catholics are anything but “merry” nowadays. Jorge Mario Bergoglio is driving folks from the Church faster than any arch-heretic could have ever dreamed.

It’s a terrible thing to be ruled by tyrants unwittingly. This is true of the secular world with its illegitimate Caesars, but even worse when it involves Church hierarchy. Recall one of Our Lord’s final lessons to his apostles in John 15:15 – 

“I will not now call you servants: for the servants knoweth not what the lord doth. But I have called you friends: because all things whatsoever I have heard of my Father, I have made known to you.”

What happens, however, when we have no idea what the Church hierarchy, now hostile to Christ, will do next; no idea what further abuses await us? That’s when you know you’re a servant, a slave, certainly not a friend, to an abusive tyrant. This is what we suffer under Bergoglio and his anti-Catholic compatriots in the Vatican. They’re great friends, thick as thieves, with each other (but NOT with you).

One final preliminary question: Is the Catholic Church in total eclipse, and therefore invisible to the faithful?

No, the Church is still visible but only if one actively seeks the truth and dedicates enough time to exploring sacred tradition. That’s the only chance of seeing through the fog of lies. Think of what happened the last time we had a full solar eclipse during the middle of the afternoon. It DID NOT become pitch black outside. Instead, we experienced a brief “twilight” or dim luminosity.

That’s what has happened to the Church. Its holy light has become obfuscated by the anti-church, but NOT extinguished. The latter is impossible. Those who will devote hours to seeking the true Gospel through tradition, not just its cheap, modern facade, will indeed find a pearl of great price. It’s merely a matter of how much you want it.

Finally, without further ado, I welcome you to consider the ample evidence demonstrating the illegitimacy and utter absurdity of a “Pope Francis.” You’ll find that the man, Bergoglio, who identifies as the pope, is about as delusional as all of today’s men who identify as women. I contend he is merely “trans-papal.”

Twenty Three Points Against Bergoglio

Point 1 – Bergoglio Wears a Blasphemous Pectoral Cross

Behold, the man people call “the pope” doesn’t even look the part because he’s wearing a hideous and blasphemous pectoral cross. It depicts Our Lord in a freemasonic pose reminiscent of the Egyptian deity, Osiris. This is the only one Bergoglio wears. He even gave a replica to the popular Internet bishop, Robert Barron, who wears it all the time, too.

There’s just one problem (or several). Osiris is a pagan god (i.e., demon), worshiped by freemasons, and it makes Jesus appear mummified with some sort of death mask.

The Freemasons love to do this pose as part of their “Osiris Risen” ritual (a mockery of Our Lord’s resurrection). You can also find photos of several celebrities making the Osiris pose. Today, there is no room for celebrating Easter (remember when they shut the churches down in 2020), but make way for praising the “resurrection” of some wicked Egyptian spirit.

Why do I put this item first? While it’s not a clincher argument against his alleged papacy, it’s perfect symbolism for what’s wrong right now. This guy doesn’t even take his job as a cleric seriously enough to wear a proper crucifix. Unless he’s a satanist, and he’s mocking everything. Every day, he wears something that makes Our Lord look like a mummy in a sarcophagus, getting dive-bombed by what appears to be a dove, representing the Holy Spirit. Some say it’s not a dove, but actually a goat’s head.

Bonus: Have you seen that cross-armed pose elsewhere? Yes, it’s the illicit posture people assume for receiving a “blessing” instead of Holy Communion. Many folks have their children do this, usually out of ignorance. Could it be that whomever invented the “blessing posture” had a pernicious agenda to spread a freemasonic gesture?

Below is Osiris (the Egyptian demon) next to an image of Aleister Crowley, one of the most infamous satanists of all time. Crowley even wrote books about Osiris. Would you say Bergoglio is in like-minded company?

Point 2 – Pope Benedict XVI failed to resign his position.

This section should be an entire book, but I’ll give you the cliff-notes version.

Have you ever read something written by a scholar that seemed verbose and confusing, almost on purpose? Chances are, if you’ve read anything from German philosophers (Kant, Hegel, etc.), you’ve run into this problem. There’s a Wikipedia section devoted to “Obscurantism,” with examples of how philosophers try to confuse people with incomprehensible verbiage.

Sometimes, even well-meaning folks write things that are frankly bizarre, ambiguous, and open to a dozen interpretations. Unfortunately, gobbledygook is ever-present among 20th century theologians, including the late Pope Benedict XVI, AKA Joseph Ratzinger.

You probably remember the strange occurrence, back in 2013, when Pope Benedict allegedly resigned the papacy. I say “allegedly” for a reason. It looks like obscurant language got the best of the Holy Father, causing him to invent a distinction between the office of the pope (munus in Latin) and its public ministry (ministerium). The easiest way to comprehend the literal text is that he only resigned from the public ministry component, but not the office itself.

If he didn’t resign the office, then he must have continued occupying it since one cannot occupy and not-occupy an office simultaneously. This means that the papacy was never vacant for any successor, let alone our friend with the Osiris cross.

Benedict may have also invented the novel idea that the papacy adds an extra layer to the Sacrament of Holy Orders, departing from the traditional understanding of episcopal consecration as the fullness of Holy Orders. Regardless of his exact intentions, he stepped away from being Bishop of Rome while maintaining the role of Vicar of Christ on earth.

All of this is thanks to confusing verbiage, but words have consequences. That’s why, for example, the words of consecration at Holy Mass must be uttered precisely. If the priest says the wrong thing, Jesus doesn’t enter the bread or wine.

It’s also an invalid resignation, according to Catholic canon law, if the Vatican queers chased away Pope Benedict or threatened his life. The legal reasoning behind this comes from canon 188 in the Catholic Code of Canon Law (first link in the appendix). You can’t validly resign a Church position under the threat of coercion.

Why do I think that may have happened? Because Benedict predicted it would in his first papal address in 2005. His very first message, as pope, was a request to pray that he “not flee for fear of the wolves.” Well, my friends, it looks like the wolves got him, and they unlawfully replaced him with a buffoonish antipope.

The lack of a valid resignation means that Bergoglio’s “Francis” fabrication is completely illogical and impossible. It would be like if Gerald Ford became president in the 1970s without Richard Nixon resigning (or getting removed from office). It’s totally incoherent.

I cannot do this enough justice in this quick pamphlet or idiot’s guide, but I would like to direct your attention to the sources in the appendix. There I have a copious list of resources, many of which illustrate the substantial errors in Pope Benedict’s resignation. Pay particular attention to Dr. Edmund Mazza (an expert on antipopes), who has plenty of scholarship on the topic.

As strange as all this sounds, it could be divine providence. We’ve just finished arguably the worst century in human history with sanctimonious, gibberish masquerading as science, philosophy, theology, and the arts. What is the legacy of 20th century “great minds”? Aside from lots of war and genocide, many folks now believe men can menstruate or that you can stop viral contagion with cloth masks (AKA those damn face panties). That’s what intellectual gibberish yields: madness, stupidity, confusion, and chaos.

Wouldn’t it be poetic justice, however, if God permitted Benedict’s resignation to use something awful (scholarly gobbledygook language) as the ultimate nullification of the Bergoglian antipapacy? God can bring good from even the worst evils. 

Finally, amid the gobbledygook, Church modernists invented a new way to view the papacy, as either “active” or “passive.” This is not the traditional understanding of any ecclesiastical office, much less the papacy. However, if you’re gullible and let modernist theologians Jedi mind trick you, then you’ll swallow such tripe, along with the bizarre Benedict resignation.

Point 3 – Bergoglio wants to eliminate the ancient Holy Sacrifice of the Mass (the Traditional Latin Rite)

Why would a true Roman Pontiff seek to eliminate the august Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, as we have commemorated it since the Crucifixion? Because he’s not the pope, but an atheist who seeks to destroy the Church.

There’s an important Latin expression that everyone should know: Lex orandi, lex credendi, lex vivendi (the law of what is prayed, is the law of what is believed, is the law of what is lived). So, the way you pray subsequently impacts how you live. Since the Mass is the highest form of prayer, we either do it right, or face life-altering consequences.

Some folks refer to Bergoglio as “Francis the Destroyer” or the “Dictator Pope” because of his megalomania and the urge to destroy the faith. If, as we say, that the Holy Mass and Eucharist are the source and summit of the faith, then Bergoglio must destroy them to achieve total Church destruction. It’s not enough to destroy marriage and family or a few of the sacraments. He has to go straight for the ecclesiastical jugular.

I can’t give an entire treatise on the differences between the new Mass of Paul VI (invented in the 1960s) versus the Traditional Latin Mass. Yet we can see Bergoglio wishes to eliminate the latter in favor of the former. If we’re honest about it, we know the new Mass (what you’d find in most parishes) was put together by enemies of the faith. It was concocted by freemasons, like Archbishop Annibale Bugnini, and a committee of protestants. That should be a huge red flag that something’s amiss with the new liturgy.

Bergoglio confirmed his war against the Traditional Latin Mass when he issued his rotten 2021 Motu Proprio, Traditionis Custodes. For those unversed in Church discipline, it was a top-down order that allowed bishops the authority to eliminate the old Mass in their dioceses. That’s horrible news, if for no other reason, because almost all the bishops are communist atheists.

His command was unprecedented and further cemented Bergoglio’s antipope status, since real popes, protected by the Holy Spirit, don’t do things like that. It’s horrible enough for a real pope to murder somebody because of his sinful nature. It’s quite another for someone, allegedly the pope, to injure Holy Mother the Church deliberately. The good news is that the latter is impossible for a legitimate pope.

One way to verify all this is by contrasting Bergoglio with all the legitimate pontiffs, including the most recent officeholder, Pope Benedict. His unlawful dictates violate previous Magisterium such as St. Pius V’s Quod Primum and Pope Benedict XVI’s Summorum Pontificum (links in the appendix). Both documents, one from the 16th century, the other from 2007, forbid the abrogation of the ancient rite, the Traditional Latin Mass.

So, who the hell does Bergoglio think he is by trying to upend Church law? Let’s see . . . 

Point 4 – Bergoglio told us he is NOT the Vicar of Christ.

If you think we should listen to this man, then why don’t you?

He has explicitly told us he’s not the Vicar of Christ in Vatican documents (the Vatican Yearbook at least), and has consistently emphasized his preference for “Bishop of Rome.” There’s no universal significance to the Roman Diocesan See, if one were to divorce it from the sacred role as Christ’s representative on earth. Since I believe this point is self-evident, I’ll conclude with that and allow you to meditate on why we would ignore the truth hidden in plain sight.

Point 5 – His confidants claim he denies the divinity of Jesus Christ.

What would you say is the most important tenet of the Catholic faith? Well, if you think it has something to do with knowing and loving Jesus Christ, the God man, then . . . you’d be at odds with antipope Bergoglio. Unlike every other antipope in Church history (there have been about 30 or 40, but none since the 15th century), Bergoglio doesn’t even believe in Christianity.

That’s if there’s any truth to the testimony of his friend and well-known Italian journalist, Eugenio Scalfari, who claimed Bergoglio denied the divinity of Christ. Alas, Scalfari is no longer alive for follow-up questions, but this allegation paints a dark and scandalizing picture of the Bergoglio regime.

Even all the bad popes believed in the faith, irrespective of whether they followed Church morality. Say what you will about Pope Alexander VII (Rodrigo Borja), he at least gave the Church the Angelus prayer, believed in God, held his position legitimately, and didn’t wear stupid feathers.

You’ll see from some of my subsequent examples, that Scalfari, an unabashed atheist, is far from the only dubious character to befriend Bergoglio. This is an important concern, too, if people really are the “average of their five closest friends.” Bergoglio has more than a handful of communist, atheist, pedophilic friends.

While we’ve never heard him deny Christ’s divinity directly, this presents a tremendous problem for “Francis” believers if it’s true. As St. Robert Bellarmine (Doctor of the Church) explains: a non-Catholic CANNOT be the pope. 

Point 6 – He keeps demon idols in St. Peter’s Basilica.

Let us never forget the lessons from the Old Testament, wherein most of the wicked kings earned their perdition by hanging idols in high places in the temple. In that context, “idol” is another term for demon, which applies the same to Old Testament examples like Baal or Moloch, just as it does to monstrosities like Pachamama.

That last one is the pagan fertility Goddess, which Bergoglio allowed indigenous Amazonians to commemorate in the Vatican Rose Garden and even St. Peter’s Basilica. Mind you, the idol figurine was a pregnant wood sculpture, with no clothes, and, frankly, ugly as sin.

Some of the Bergoglio apologists claimed it was an avante-garde depiction of the Blessed Virgin Mary. Again, however, the sculpture was naked and hideous. That’s not how we depict the Blessed Virgin, to put it mildly. Thankfully, someone chunked the damn thing into the Tiber River, much to the chagrin of Bergoglio.

Perhaps the idol parade was an isolated incident? No, because the Vatican also allowed these folks to set up banners with a woman breast-feeding a wolf all over the place. I can only imagine what type of fertility they had in mind.

The Pachamama fertility goddess is every bit as awful as you’d think, too. In 2022, one drunken fellow in Bolivia attended a similar fertility ceremony, awoke after passing out, only to find himself crammed into a coffin. Apparently, in his inebriated state, the pagans found him to be a suitable sacrifice to their goddess. He got over his hangover just in time to escape the coffin, which is better than we can say for St. Peter’s Basilica, still defiled by that horrible filth.

Bonus: Remember that the Basilica in Rome was the same place Bergoglio performed his fake Russia/Ukraine “consecration.” Although this may disappoint many Catholics, since Our Lady of Fatima requested a Russia consecration, Bergoglio’s 2022 attempt cannot satisfy heaven’s demand. Why is that? Because antipopes can’t consecrate Russia any more than I can. Therefore, his 2022 constipation was a failure, and probably made things worse.

Point 7 – In 2022, Bergoglio wore a ridiculous “Indian feather headdress” for another pagan ceremony.

This section explains the story behind my title picture where Bergoglio wears the stereotypical Indian feather gear, which is not photoshopped. What prompted him to don such ridiculous garb? Bergoglio visited Canada in 2022 on a diplomatic mission to apologize, on behalf of the Church, for alleged atrocities against Canadian indigenous folks (which are historically inaccurate).

While he was there doing his best to gaslight Canadian Catholics, he participated in a pagan “smudging ceremony.” The purpose of such an event, for indigenous Canadians, was to invoke a “sacred circle of spirits” along with the “Western Grandmother.” In short, it was a how-to guide to getting possessed by demons, and Bergoglio gave his blessing.

Even the worst popes in history wouldn’t be caught dead attending something like this. Pope Boniface VIII, of substantially happier memory, may have been a tyrant, but never a pagan idolater.

For more background on why pagan “deities” are always demons, consider reading the early chapters of St. Augustine’s classic, The City of God. You can also meditate on Psalm 95 or read through most of the Hebrew history in the Old Testament.

Between the Osiris pectoral cross, the Pachamama, and the Western Grandmother, there’s never been a greater champion of pagan religion. Does this guy worship ALL the demons? He makes a far better candidate for Dark Lord of the Sith or Supreme Pagan Arch-Druid than pope. I recall how Pope St. Pius V abolished the position of “Papal Court Jester” during the Counter-Reformation. Perhaps Antipope Bergoglio, with his feather regalia, would reinstate it and insert himself into that role. Nobody else has better qualifications.

Oh, but it gets worse . . . 

Point 8 – Association with abortionists, freemasons, eugenicists, pedophiles, sodomites, communists, and other anti-Catholics.

We don’t have to limit the criticism of Bergoglio to “guilt by association,” but there is plenty of it. Whether it’s appointing a pro-abortion advocate (Mariana Mazzucato) to the Pontifical Academy for Life, or letting degenerate celebrities headline his public events, Bergoglio is a big-tent kind of guy when choosing his friends. I could make an enormous list of other horrible accomplices (Jeffrey Sachs, Chelsea Clinton, Katy Perry, etc.), but it would run several pages. 

I’ve already mentioned how he enjoys the company of folks, like Eugenio Scalfari, who are unabashed atheists and claim Bergoglio is, too. He’s also not afraid to betray the Catholic clergy he views as political enemies. Even as far back as the 1970s, he ratted out a fellow priest, Orlando Yorio, to the brutal left-wing military junta in Argentina.

He’s also on a first-name basis with accused child-trafficker, Gustavo Vera, from Argentina.. On the surface, Vera operates an NGO, La Alameda, ostensibly dedicated to eliminating child exploitation. However, that’s about as believable as Tony Soprano running a sanitation business rather than a mob family. In 2019, one of Vera’s victims, Natacha Jaitt, blew the whistle on his pedophilia ring, only to be found “suicided” less than a year later (after insisting she’d never kill herself). Perhaps that’s just what happens when you accuse a friend of Bergoglio of sex trafficking. 

I understand that almost anybody in a position of influence will have accusations levied against them, and many are unreliable or fabricated. Can we at least ask why, with Bergoglio, there are so friggin’ many? Mind you, I’m just getting started. It turns out his most unsavory accomplices are the wicked brood of vipers right there in the Vatican.

Point 9 – The St. Gallen Mafia (Bergoglio’s Posse) violated Pope John Paul II’s rule against rigging papal conclaves.

This is an important piece of evidence regarding his usurpation, but it’s secondary to the faulty Benedict resignation. The easiest way to comprehend the canon law and Church regulations is to understand that when you break the election rules, your “papacy” doesn’t count.

Assuming Benedict XVI resigned properly (he didn’t, so there was no reason for a new conclave), it’s illegal for any faction to extort or make “back-room deals” to get their candidate into office. Imagine if one of the American political parties tried to elect a fugitive or foreigner to the presidency, thereby violating the Constitution. Oh wait . . . 

While it’s lawful to form a coalition to support a particular candidate, the wicked scheme of the St. Gallen Mafia goes beyond that, and violates the law handed down by Pope John Paul II in his apostolic constitution, Universi Dominici Gregis. JPII anticipated this mess and made rigging the conclave illegal.

In a nutshell, the St. Gallen Mafia, a group of cardinals dedicated to advancing sodomy, colluded to get their guy on the Throne of Peter. The now-deceased Cardinal Godfried Danneels essentially confessed to the entire scheme. Once again, the illegitimacy of the Francis papacy hides in plain sight. Are you willing to see it?

Bonus: If anybody’s wondering – No, we should not refer to folks like JPII, Paul VI, Mother Teresa, or John XXIII with the title “saint” because they were “canonized” by Bergoglio. Antipopes, as I’m sure you know, can’t canonize saints any more than smart-alecs like myself can. That doesn’t mean they aren’t saints, per se, just that antipopes can’t do the honors.

Point 10 – He celebrates arch-heretics like Martin Luther.

Imagine, let’s say 15 years ago, somebody told you that a Catholic pope would approve of a statue of Martin Luther in the Vatican. You would probably have laughed hysterically at such an absurd suggestion. Well, Jorge Bergoglio overheard your laughter and told his compatriots to “hold my beer.”

Yes, in 2016, the Vatican erected a statue of the most infamous arch-heretic of the past millennium (if not all time). You have to hand it to him, though. Bergoglio’s been spending the last nine years livin’ in the antipope’s paradise. While this may scandalize an ill-informed Catholic, it shouldn’t bother anybody with eyes to see and ears to hear.

Point 11 – Bergoglio further blasphemed Our Lord’s crucifix by accepting a “Hammer & Sickle Crucifix” from the communist president of Bolivia.

Yes, there have been many renditions of the Holy Cross over the ages. Some of them, like the Jansenist Crucifix, have been met with Church condemnation. Apparently, it’s okay to make a commie crucifix, even though the previous popes (i.e., real ones) condemned communism. Fortunately, we have nothing to worry about, as faithful Catholics, because the Bergoglian anti-church cannot “rupture” the real Church’s magisterial teaching any more than any other Gates of Hell.

Point 12 – He pretends he didn’t know about clerical sexual predators like Ted McCarrick.

Many Catholics, too gullible to be allowed leave from their homes, believed that there were no sexual predators in the Catholic episcopacy prior to 2018. These same Catholics probably don’t know about the Osiris crucifix either, but I digress. In 2018, the walls came tumbling down and everyone learned the horrible truth about the serial-sodomite, and boy-sex-addict, Theodore McCarrick (AKA “Uncle Ted”).

You probably heard about this already, so I’ll spare you the gory details. Here, you had the most powerful American prelate, exposed for molesting dozens of seminarians, yet it took forever to defrock him for various reasons. If the testimony of Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano is true, Bergoglio knew all about horny-old Uncle Ted, and ignored his crimes until Vigano exposed everything in 2018.

This on its own doesn’t prove Bergoglio’s an antipope, since bad popes do these things sometimes. I categorize this with the other examples that show how he’s also the worst man to approach the papacy, legitimate or not. There was at least one antipope, Hippolytus, who repented of his usurpation and later became a canonized saint. We’ll have to pray ceaselessly for Bergoglio to repent of everything he’s done, go to confession, and spend the rest of his life in a monastery, perhaps next to Uncle Ted.

Bonus: While speaking of Ex-Cardinal McCarrick, here’s another example of a prelate wearing a bizarre pectoral cross. His reminds me of a stick-figured Christmas ornament, but with a leg missing (and no cross).

If that symbolizes Jesus on the cross, why would a leg be missing? I thought the Gospels were pretty clear that Our Lord’s legs weren’t broken. Why do modernist fakes like Bergoglio and McCarrick adorn themselves this way?

Point 13 – He writes heretical documents like Amoris Laetitia.

Before Bergoglio wrote his hell-spawned, post-synodal apostolic exhortation, Amoris Laetitia (2016), only left-wing lunatics (i.e., non-Catholics) would defend the reception of holy communion after divorce and remarriage. Catholics have always known that divorce doesn’t exist, and if you try it anyway, you’re separated from the Church, and ineligible to receive Holy Communion until you go to confession.

Again, this is not so for the most heretical antipope in history by many canyon lengths. When four Cardinals asked for the proper interpretation of Amoris Laetitia, he refused to answer, other than to confirm that the most heretical interpretation was indeed the correct one (more on this in point #15). 

As usual, this is no concern for well-formed Catholics who know that antipopes cannot formulate magisterium, either ordinary or extraordinary. Moreover, we can rejoice that this antipope would probably get lost trying to find the Chair of Peter to proclaim an infallible teaching.

Bonus: My sources tell me that the Latin word, Amoris, has at least seven or eight translations. One of those pertains to “gay love.” So, what if the proper translation of Amoris Laetitia is “The Joy of Gay Love”? Hmm, that doesn’t sound terribly Catholic, but, then again, neither does Bergoglio.

Point 14 – His “pontificate” abandoned Chinese Catholics.

In 2016, Hong Kong Cardinal Joseph Zen warned it would be akin to “betraying Jesus Christ” if Bergoglio’s Vatican insisted on making a deal with the Chinese government “at all costs.” This was regarding how much influence the secular government would have over selecting bishops there. The CCP would, of course, want to veto any non-CCP sympathizers and quell authentic Catholicism.

Sure enough, Cardinal Zen was right, and the Vatican caved into the Chinese government. Now, the CCP chooses who is in charge of the Catholic Church in China. It’s now almost impossible for a positive outcome because the Vatican is in cahoots with or in fear of China. Therefore, Chinese Catholics won’t have real bishops, and even less recourse against the communist anthill, the CCP.

Point 15 – He ignores cardinals who submit polite clarification requests over the heretical claims in Amoris Laetitia.

Unfortunately, the College of Cardinals is basically an ecclesiastical relic these days. Since almost every member is a rabid sodomite, covers for sodomites, suffers from financial scandals, or is otherwise blackmail-able, they NEVER utter a word against Bergoglio. Josef Stalin could only dream of such universal obedience.

Why does this matter? Because, as most Catholics know, the cardinals are the ones with the most authority after the pope. While we wouldn’t expect a pope to listen to every one of them (there are over 200 members), one would think he would have time when there are pressing concerns over faith and morals. This is not true of the alleged Francis pontificate.

The last time any cardinals attempted even a meek opposition, Bergoglio ignored them. This happened when Cardinals Raymond Burke, Walter Brandmuller, Carlo Caffarra, and Joachim Meisner questioned the evil exhortation, Amoris Laetitia. For their efforts, those men were ignored, fired from their Vatican posts, and a couple of them died waiting for a response.

Point 16 – He promotes the gay heretic: James Martin.

Who are the two most popular “Catholic” users on the social-media platform, Twitter? One of them is Bergoglio, the putative antipope. The other is James Martin, a Jesuit priest. There’s a LOT to say about Martin, but perhaps the most fascinating part is that his superiors require him to never speak about his sexual orientation.

Ask yourself, dear reader, have you ever had a boss tell you not to disclose your sexual orientation? Why exactly would anybody require that? Yet, James Martin, who’s never served in the military, is the only remaining American subjected to “don’t ask, don’t tell.

What does that have to do with the price of tea in China? Because Antipope Bergoglio named James Martin (a priest, not even a bishop) as the Vatican’s Secretariat for Communications. So, he put the gay-not-gay priest in charge of a major Vatican post. What could possibly go wrong?

In 2021, Bergoglio also praised Martin for his effort to “imitate the style of God” during his ministry with LGBTQ Catholics. Among many distortions, Martin believes God created some men and women with different identities, including ones involving sodomite activity. He must have missed the part in Genesis where God torched all the folks in Sodom and Gomorrah for exercising those “identities.” Of course, there are no such intrinsic identities, and to say otherwise contradicts the principle of integral good regarding God’s creation, and thus blasphemes God. That doesn’t matter to James Martin or Jorge Bergoglio, though.

Point 17 –  Gay Is Okay -> Just Don’t “Breed Like Rabbits.”

When Bergoglio was asked about family planning following a trip to the Philippines, he warned that one does not “have to breed like rabbits to be a good Catholic.” I find it interesting that he said this after visiting that particular country. Were they his intended audience?

At the time, in 2015, the Filipino birth rate was only 2.80, just marginally higher than the replacement level (which is 2.10). In 1960, their birth rate was 7.15.

If that was his target audience, then that’s a hell of a message for a place whose birth rate collapsed by over 150%. I understand Bergoglio doesn’t want to grow the Catholic Church, but could we at least have an antipope that comprehends numbers? Finally, why is Bergoglio, a guy obsessed with fertility demons (Pachamama, Osiris, etc.) against breeding, anyway?

There’s even one news outlet that describes the Filipino birth rate plunge as the “sharpest ever” decline. My friends, if you fall for this guy and his rabbit tricks, then you’re falling for the dumbest dictator in history.

Point 18 – Antipope Bergoglio also promotes BISHOPS who protect pedophiles and rapists.

Was it enough for Bergoglio to ignore the mega-pedophile Ted McCarrick? Nope, as antipope, it’s his job to sustain the ranks of the Catholic episcopacy with pedophiles and rapists. After all, you must replenish the vacancy left by McCarrick somehow.

While he hasn’t elevated James Martin to the Cardinalate (yet), he has promoted a bishop who protects priests who rape their parishioners in Satanic black masses (you can’t make this stuff up). Check out Bishop Robert McElroy, the most recent elevation to the College of Cardinals in America (2022). The now Cardinal McElroy, who gets his red hat only as a suffragan bishop (not archbishop) for the Diocese of San Diego, has been accused of covering sexual abuse multiple times.

Perhaps the most egregious example was the ritualistic rape of Rachel Mastrogiacomo by one of McElroy’s priests, Jacob Bertrand, in 2010. While civil authorities eventually prosecuted and imprisoned Bertrand, it wasn’t until after lots of subterfuge and cover-up work by McElroy. There’s a lot to this horrific story, it’s not an isolated example, you should research it for yourself, but do so with reader discretion.

Nevertheless, this is just what you get from the Satanic clergy in the American hierarchy, which marches in lockstep with Bergoglio. Don’t forget that it includes parish priests, and goes all the way into the episcopacy and cardinalate (see McCarrick, McElroy, Bernardin, Mahoney, Cupich, and so forth).

Point 19 – Shut down the Church for COVID-19.

You may wonder if I’m scrutinizing Antipope Bergoglio too hard for being a communist, pedophile protector, pagan worshiper, Lutheran sympathizer, papal usurper, freemason, tyrant. I know that I have EXORBITANT expectations of the “wholly father.” What if we simply discuss the duties and functions of the Catholic Church? What does the Church actually do?

Let’s think about the Seven Sacraments and the priesthood of Our Lord, Jesus Christ. Along with governance and teaching, ministering the sacraments is the core of the Church’s mission.

Alas, in 2020, the anti-Church, under the auspices of antipope Bergoglio, unplugged the Church’s power cord, and was told to NOT DO ANYTHING during the duration of the spooky pandemic. This is in stark contrast to the days of the Black Death, when holy clergy, such as St. Charles Borromeo, risked their lives to bring Catholics the sacraments.

This time, every single diocese had to cease offering Mass and several other restrictions, which is only possible when the man (whom everyone calls the pope) requires it. We cannot fathom the eternal consequences for all the Catholics who went to their graves without the last rites. Pray for the repose of their souls.

Point 20 – When was the last time you saw a pope swat somebody?

They usually don’t. Antipopes, to the contrary, spend their time slapping away adoring women, or at least Bergoglio does. You can find a video link to the incident in the appendix. To his credit, he apologized over it, but it’s not the only time he’s been rude to Catholic lay people.

There’s also a video of him pulling his hand away when folks wanted to kiss his papal ring (also linked in the appendix). Then again, maybe that was divine mercy for those folks since antipopes don’t have “papal” rings.

One last note about the Chinese lady he swatted. Remember that she’s one of the same Chinese Catholics who the Bergoglio regime has abandoned along with Cardinal Zen. That poor lady probably just wanted the “pope” to save her people from the CCP.

Then again, how dare this unreasonable woman take precious seconds away from his busy job of praising idols, railing about climate change, and protecting pedophiles? In the Gospels, Our Lord didn’t swat away the Canaanite woman who reached for his garment. Bergoglio, on the other hand, has a different point of view on such matters.

Point 21 – Bergoglio only holds political enemies accountable.

Catholic priests in Europe and America offer “clown Masses,” “gay Masses,” or give benedictions with a guitar, all the time, with impunity. While those blasphemers get away with anything, the Bergoglian regime laicizes priests for the crime of possessing “the wrong politics.”

As of January 2023, it’s still a developing story, but the Vatican has apparently laicized (defrocked) the American priest, Fr. Frank Pavone, for dubious reasons. Everyone is still unclear over why, but the purported allegations involve transgressions that happened years earlier.

The best part of the story is that the Vatican didn’t have the courage or courtesy to inform Fr. Pavone of his laicization. Instead, he found out about it from the press, one week before Christmas (ho-ho-ho). This sneaky move must have come from Rome, too, because his laicization includes no possibility of appeal, which would ordinarily go through Rome. Yet, the Vatican pedo-masons, undoubtedly at the behest of Bergoglio, didn’t even have the guts to inform him of the termination.

How would you like to get fired from your job and learn about it from a Yahoo news article . . . one week before Christmas? That’s how they handle human resources at the Vatican.

Again, this is a developing story, but Fr. Pavone also happens to be one of the most visible pro-life American priests and an opponent of American leftism. This made him a prime target of Bergoglio and the St. Gallen Mafia.

Point 22 – Bergoglio, the tyrant, insists Catholics get a COVID vaccine.

I don’t think people fully appreciate the radical extent of the Bergoglio regime’s COVID vaccine push. Until now, there has only been one item that the Church ever requires Catholics to consume: The Most Holy Eucharist (at least during Eastertide).

In 2020, Catholics were told by Bergoglio’s anti-church to receive a new mandatory item: the most unholy vaccine. I’m hardly the first commentator to suggest that the anti-church loves its COVID vaccine almost like an anti-sacrament.

Leaving aside how the vaccines are undoubtedly marinated in aborted baby parts, how did we get so gullible on this? Thanks to scholars like St. Thomas Aquinas, we know we don’t have to obey unjust laws.

We also know that the folks who’ve made the “vaccine,” are the same dastardly bastards who poison us with a slew of other pharmacological crap. They also manufacture all those damn contraceptives we’re not supposed to use. Anybody who thinks Catholics are bound to take such an illicit substance should be forcefully committed into an asylum.

Point 23 – Finally, If you think Bergoglio’s the Pope, then insulting him is a grave sin.

I encounter many Catholics, who fashion themselves “traditionalists,” yet staunchly believe Bergoglio is the pope. They also make snide remarks about him. Unfortunately, the tradition of the Church holds that insulting a true Roman Pontiff constitutes grave sin.

There are two ways to approach this matter –

1) If he is the pope, then we must say, with St. Catherine of Siena, that “even if the pope were Satan incarnate, we ought not to raise up our heads against him.”

2) If Bergoglio is (as I contend) an antipope, then we have every right to ridicule him as a usurper. There is a precedence for doing this if we follow the example of St. Cajetan: “If someone for a reasonable motive holds the person of the pope in suspicion and refuses his presence, even his jurisdiction, he does not commit the delict of schism.”

So, you must either obey a bad pope or resist an antipope. We cannot entertain this silly business of “recognizing and resisting” an illegitimate pontiff. When there’s an antipope, you refuse and resist. There’s no middle ground here. It’s just like how there’s no such thing as two popes, a plurality of religions, an empty hell, or any of the other diabolical garbage we hear these days. Don’t forget that one of the most frequent admonishments from Our Lord and his apostles was to beware of false shepherds. 

Conclusion

Therefore, with this voluminous body of evidence, I would be remiss to call the Bergoglian regime an “unmitigated disaster.” That implies that it’s a random, uncontrollable occurrence, akin to a runaway locomotive. Bergoglio, rather, does this crap intentionally with a full-fisted fury, reminiscent of the most horrible tyrants to walk the earth. Bergoglio isn’t just “bad at his job” or something unpleasant, lamentable, and unavoidable like a hurricane. He gets a big, communist, pedophile-protecting, pagan-worshiping, freemasonic, antipapal kick out of it.

Why is he worse than a bad pope? Because he masquerades as Supreme Roman Pontiff, leaving scandal everywhere he goes by convincing confused Catholics to jettison his anti-church (understandably), which they MISTAKE for the real Church, The Bride of Christ. The intentional misleading of souls carries a punishment far worse than having a millstone tied around one’s neck and cast into the sea.

Is everything gloom and doom now in the Catholic Church?

No! Emphatically no!

What happens when you look beyond the veneer of the fake church and all its freemasonry, sodomy, and paganism?

You’ll encounter the most magnificent thing in the world. The real Catholic Church is the gate to eternal bliss with God for all eternity. Today’s pedo-clergy and the global deep state just impede our knowledge of all the awesome stuff. The real Catholic Church is the source of resplendent supernatural manifestations, even in modern times. This includes public miracles like the sun dance at Fatima, Portugal in 1917. At that time, 100,000 people saw the Blessed Virgin Mary cause the sun to jump around in the sky. Something of that magnitude, which converted slews of Portuguese communists and atheists, almost made the parting of the Red Sea pale in comparison.

How many people even know about that very public and historical miracle from just over 100 years ago? In the secular world, scarcely anybody, yet legions of folks prefer to poison their minds following the Kardashians.

What about the hundreds of documented Eucharistic miracles throughout the ages (to say nothing of all the unconfirmed ones)? How come nobody knows about these? Because the evil, illegitimate, and freemasonic world governments, in cahoots with the fake church, do everything they can to censor or obfuscate this spectacular manifestation of God’s glory. Here are just a couple of splendid Eucharistic miracles that are totally unknown to most people:

• 2013 – In Legnica, Poland, after a Host had fallen onto the floor, scientists placed it in water where it emitted reddish stains (blood). They tested the red substance with histopathological imagery and found fragments of cross-striated muscle, the kind typically found in human hearts. They could even distinguish it as the type of blood found in distressed hearts, following a serious trauma episode. Also, whenever researchers check the blood type during miracles like these, they always find “AB,” the rarest kind, which occurs with a less than 1% frequency. Furthermore, AB is the universally transmissible type most suitable for transfusions and healing purposes. That sounds vaguely familiar to something else we’ve heard, eh?
• 1906 – The small community of Tumaco, Colombia faced a massive tsunami after a violent earthquake shook the region. In response, Fr. Gerardo Larrondo led an Eucharistic procession toward the beach. Upon arrival, he made the Sign of the Cross with the Eucharist in the monstrance, just as the tsunami approached. The benediction was enough to halt the enormous wave immediately and spare the community from disaster.

You can Google this topic and find page after page of similar examples, yet almost everyone is oblivious to them. By contrast, almost everybody can recite numerous hackneyed legends like George Washington chopping down a cherry tree. My friends, the pearl of great price is right in front of you, hidden in plain sight, if only you seek to see it.

I hope you found this information useful. Each of these topics demand further investigation since I’ve only skimmed the surface here. My goal was to condense everything into a reader-friendly pamphlet. So, please use the web to dive further into these horrible scandals (and wonderful miracles). Finally, give this pamphlet to someone else, so they can avoid the miserable cognitive dissonance of the “Francis Pontificate.”

The Gospel of Our Lord really is good news: the way, the truth, and the light. The truth will set us free, whereas through the Bergoglian delusion, we’re forced to either abandon Holy Mother Church or submit to an awful ecclesiastical Stockholm Syndrome. I suggest you do neither. Deus Vult!

Appendix: Helpful Resources for Discerning the Bergoglian Antipapacy

• 1983 Code of Canon Law
• Dr. Edmund Mazza’s Website (He Studies Antipopes & Church History)
• Antonio Socci’s Book, The Secret of Benedict XVI: Is He Still the Pope?

• St. Robert Bellarmine on Heretics & Antipopes
• Ann Barnhardt’s Website (TONS of great information here)
• Mark Docherty’s Website (Another Terrific Antichurch Exposer)
• Miller Dissertation (Detailing the “De-Mythologization” of the Papacy)
• Catholic Esquire – Why Benedict is Still the Pope
• Critical Analysis of Amoris Laetitia (by About 4 Dozen Theologians)
• The City of God by St. Augustine (Why All Other “gods” are Demons)
• Bishop Rene Gracida’s Blog (the oldest bishop in America, and supporter of the position that Benedict maintained the papacy)
• Bergoglio Swatting a Chinese Woman
• Bergoglio Refusing to Let Folks Kiss His Ring (since he’s not pope)
• Miracle of the Sun (Our Lady of Fatima)
• Compilation of Eucharistic Miracles
• Pope John Paul II’s Apostolic Constitution, Universi Dominici Gregis
• Pope St. Pius V’s Encyclical, Quod Primum
• Pope Benedict XVI’s Motu Proprio, Summorum Ponitificum
• Report of Bergoglio and Kidnapping Compliance in Argentina
• Whistleblower Against Gustavo Vera, Found Dead (Vera is Bergoglio’s Buddy)