Yes, The Jews Have Killed Christian Children

“And it was not enough for them to err about the knowledge of God, but whereas they lived in a great war of ignorance, they call so many and so great evils peace. For either they sacrifice their own children, or use hidden sacrifices, or keep watches full of madness.” –Wisdom 14: 22-23

The Jews, regardless of whether they acknowledge it, have quite a miserable history of aggression. They murder individuals, incite national revolutions, depose sovereign authorities, and terrorize societies with pornography, economic usury, fake news, and countless other assaults. This continues to this day, although they almost always outright deny their atrocities.

Benjamin Netanyahu, Emperor of the Talmudic Jews, gave a recent interview, attempting to rebut the notion of Israeli involvement in the Charlie Kirk assassination. You can listen for yourself, but I wish to alert your attention to some of the other stuff he said.

After accusing his critics of exaggerations (“Israel changes the orbit of the moon”), he suggested that today’s conspiratorial environment reminded him of the “horrific Middle Ages.” He lamented past times when critics accused Jews for having “poisoned the wells and drank the blood of Christian children.”

Ah, but did Jews ever commit such barbarous affronts during those “horrific” times?

That’s what I’ll explore in this article. My contention is YES, the Jews perpetrated such crimes against humanity, and have done so at a rampant frequency. Holy Mother Church has even beatified at least one Jewish-murdered child martyr, Simon of Trent. 

Despite a few legalities, I believe we’re well within our right to consider him SAINT Simon of Trent. Were it not for Jewish machinations into Church affairs, St. Simon would enjoy full, unequivocal veneration, but, alas, politics, ecumenism, and public relations have disrupted it.

Nevertheless, his ritualistic murder, at the hands of Talmudic Jews, testifies to the Passion and Death of Jesus Christ, having been carried out by like-minded assailants. That, of course, carries some uncomfortable consequences regarding our friends who sometimes wear curly sideburns.

Alas, Jews killed Christian children. While this may horrify and stupefy contemporary minds, we must acknowledge reality. That’s my position as a loyal Catholic. Now, I shall cover the awful details of this topic, offering support for the notion that the Jews have drunk the blood of children.

Brief Introduction to St. Simon of Trent’s Martyrdom

The story of Simon of Trent, AKA “Simon Immaculate,” involves the human sacrifice of the two-year-old child at the hands of vicious assailants. Simon’s father discovered him missing late in the afternoon of Maundy Thursday in 1475 in the Italian city of Trent.

They found Simon on Easter Sunday, submerged in a water cellar in a type of makeshift synagogue. This specific location served as a “Mikveh” designed for ritualistic bathing, per Jewish tradition. Authorities found Simon’s body, heavily mutilated, exsanguinated, and crucified upside-down; no doubt the result of foul play.

The only question is who would have done such a heinous thing, which led to the apprehension of several Jewish men, who confessed the crime, albeit under torture. While the torture of these men has led Church critics to dismiss the potential for Jewish involvement, we’re left to wonder how a toddler suffered crucifixion just before Good Friday. Although torture-driven confessions are certainly dubious, it doesn’t at all mean that local Jews didn’t murder the child.

Somehow, we’re supposed to believe, according to modern historians, that a Christian child was found murdered in a Jewish environment, yet no Jews could have done it. Indeed . . . 

Someone must have carried out a murder given the condition of Simon’s crucified and blood-drained remains. The only questions are who and with what motives. Perhaps the only two reasonable theories could have been: 1) Jews did it, or 2) Catholics did it to frame Jews. Nothing else, given the context of the murder, lends to a plausible alternative hypothesis.

Even Count Dracula, were he a real figure, wouldn’t go to such lengths to mutilate his victims as the Jews are alleged to do.

I’ll come back to this later when I discuss corroborating evidence for this foul deed, an all too frequent occurrence among Kabbalistic Talmudic Jews. Before I do, I should note that the Church once approved the veneration of young Simon’s martyrdom, but modern ecumenists, since the 1960s, have capitulated to the Jews by ceasing it.

Suppression of Veneration

Today, the recognition of this holy child, who died for love of Jesus Christ, has been jettisoned down a memory hole at the hands of the Roman modernists. Pope Paul VI suppressed the cult of veneration for Simon of Trent the VERY SAME DAY Nostra Aetate was published (October 28, 1968).

Is this a coincidence? Of course, it isn’t.

Nostra Aetate was THE monumental moment for the Jewish hijacking of the Catholic hierarchy and structures (particularly via B’nai B’rith). This was the council document that enshrined the contradiction to Catholic dogma, that those outside the Church (Jews, Muslims, etc.) could still achieve salvation (AKA universalism).

Nostra Aetate also introduced, for the first time in Church history, the suggestion that other religions possessed certain degrees of holiness (a blasphemous concept for true Catholics). None of this should surprise us, as we should now be well-accustomed to this ecclesiological revolution.

The modernist Anti-Church, intruding into every component of Church structures, eliminated public veneration (including local parades) honoring St. Simon of Trent just as it crammed through Nostra Aetate. This was about three years before Paul VI truncated the rest of the Canon of Saints, discarding “legendary” figures like St. Christopher.

Besides those hindrances, there have been several other would-be saints snubbed of their canonizations. This includes the magnificent pontiff, Blessed Pius IX, whose canonization the Jews also stifled, and for parallel reasons to the blockage of Simon of Trent’s (long story).

The Church endured the same interferences again (including internally, among liberal churchmen) when that same pope sought to define the dogma of Our Lady’s Immaculate Conception. Many church figures (modernists, we call them) also loathed the definition of Our Lady’s Glorious Assumption. We should appreciate how, by the grace of God, these infallible proclamations came to fruition despite overwhelming odds.

Today, those enemies will do anything they can to prevent the official proclamation of Mary as Co-Redemptrix, even insisting against it. Finally, we might wonder about other canonization omissions among holy and heroic figures, like Mother Mariana Torres, the seer of the apparitions of Our Lady of Good Success.

There are countless other examples of antagonists toward the Church producing schemes like these (to the detriment of the faithful). The Jews, a powerful world minority, to say the least, always feature prominently among them.

This is something you must bear in mind if you seek to educate yourself on these contentious topics. While we’re at it, I must mention something else about researching anything related to Jewish improprieties.

Advice for Researching Jewish Topics

I must recommend some advice to anyone new to the research of sensitive topics like these. The results and opinions you discover depend heavily upon the search engines you select.

If, for instance, you Google search “Jews crucified Christians,” it will first bombard you with an AI message insisting it’s a historical falsehood. However, if you enter the same query into Yandex, a non-Jewish-dominated engine (for now), the results are much different. The first Yandex result is an article from Tradition in Action detailing the macabre execution of Simon of Trent.

Google, on the other hand, will feed you this delightful tripe from the ADL, explaining how the Jews didn’t even crucify Jesus. Wikipedia’s coverage of the topic is just as flaccid, Jew-apologetic, and altogether useless. The big takeaway is that inquiring minds must know where to look if they seek to unearth reliable information on these often-whitewashed subjects.

Why does this matter?

Because you must develop a habit of using less popular search engines, lest you risk entrapment into the Jewish-media-industrial-complex.

Jewish Blood Rituals: Do We Possess Sufficient Evidence of Them?

As I alluded to in the introduction, the concept of blood rituals is a contentious topic. Most Internet commentary comes from Jews who summarily deny it as if they were desperate harlots lying about their virginity.

One reason to doubt the Jewish denial of what they call “Blood Libel” is to behold the substantial volume of alleged cases. Jewish resources pass this off as a “blood libel superstition.” In their eyes, every serious allegation of Jewish crime amounts to nothing more than an “antisemitic trope.”

I, and anyone else who researches the topic, can identify several examples of this, enough to make it much more intriguing than a mere trope. There are other examples of Jews killing Christians, even outside the Catholic context.

The Greek Orthodox suffered similar atrocities with ritualistic Jews, involving the murder of yet another young boy in 1840. Yet again, however, contemporary historians have dismissed it as libelous. You’ll notice, if you examine the case context, that the Jews only escaped prosecution by appealing to European governments and the powerful Rothschilds.

How amazed we should be to learn that Jewish murderers once again enjoyed impunity by securing a criminal bailout from their wealthy brethren? That never happens (or so we’re told).

A Select List of Alleged Ritual Homicides

Tradition in Action editor, Atilla Guimaraes, created a table of 67 alleged ritual homicides of Catholic children by Ashkenazi Jews, organized by country/city and date. This references the book, Passovers of Blood (2007), by Jewish author, Ariel Toaff. Most of Toaff’s accounts congregate around the latter Middle Ages in places like Italy, England, Austria, Germany, and France.

Italy 1451 Candia (pp. 41, 43, 45) 1451 Trent (p. 65) 1456 Savona (pp. 66, 127) 1469 Padua (pp. 64, 76) 1472-1475 Trent (pp. 12, 51, 52, 64, 174) 1479 Arena (p. 57) 1480 Portobuffalè (pp. 54, 55) 1481 Cremona (p. 56)1482 Tortona (pp. 55, 56, 78) 1485 Valrovina (pp. 59, 60) No date: Mestre (p. 64);Piedmont (p. 64); Pavia (p. 66) Germany & Austria 1147 Würzburg (p. 98) 1187 Mainz (p. 101) 1195 Speyer (p. 101) 1197 Neuss (p. 102) 1199 Cologne (p. 101) 1235 Fulda (p. 102) 1261 Pforzheim (pp. 68, 69, 97, 103) 1283 Bacharach (pp. 103, 105) 1283 Mainz (p. 103) 1285 Munich (p. 104) 1293 Krems (p. 104) 1303 Weissensee (p. 105) 1332 Überlingen (p. 104) 1345 Munich (p. 104) 1429 Ravensburg (p. 105) 1429 Oberwesel (p. 105) 1440 Landshut (p. 70) 1442 Lienz (p. 104) 1460 Worms (pp. 62, 63, 68) 1461 Gunzenhausen (p. 63) 1462 Rinn (p. 61) 1462-1470 Endingen (pp. 67, 68, 69) 1465 Nuremberg (pp. 68) 1466 Bayreuth (p. 63) 1467 Regensburg (pp. 70, 72, 87, 174) 1504 Waldkirch (p. 93

Switzerland 1294 Bern (p. 105) 1329 Geneva (p. 126) 1329 Annecy (p. 126) England 1144-1146 Norwich (pp. 7, 95-98, 102) 1160-1168 Gloucester (p. 99) 1181 Bury (p. 99) 1183 Bristol (p. 99) 1193 Winchester (p. 99) 1244 London (p. 99)1255 Lincoln (pp. 99, 100) 1279 Northampton (p. 103) 1463 Wending (p. 63) No date: Canterbury (p. 100) Hungary 1494 Tyrnaau (pp. 82-88) 1520 Posing (p. 88) France 1171 Blois (p. 100) 1179 Joinville (p. 100) 1179 Pointoise (p. 100) 1191 Brie (p. 115) 1247 Valréas (p. 97) 1288 Troyes (p. 103) 1329 Rumilly (p. 126) 1453 Arles (p. 127) 1458 Chambery (p. 105) Spain 1456 Valladolid (p. 66) Bohemia 1305 Prague (p. 104) Syria 415 Inmestar (pp. 114, 115)

Toaff’s book, widely condemned by his fellow Jews, details each of these occurrences and supplies supporting evidence for blood rituals. The author also draws from various Jewish “Anti-Gospels,” such as the Toledot Yeshu (History of Jesus), depicting Jesus as a bastard child, born of a menstruating woman. You can think of it as a continuation of the infamous blasphemies begotten by the wicked Babylonian Talmud.

The Toledot Yeshu is an example of Jewish literature placing heavy emphasis on children’s blood, and its essential role in preparing for the Jewish Passover. Remember that it was during Holy Week that they found St. Simon of Trent murdered, during a year in which the Passover and Holy Week coincided.

That was not a coincidence if you understand how the Jews value children’s blood, preferring Christian children, maximizing a mockery of Jesus Christ, and fortifying themselves for their Passover. Never mind that the purpose of the old Passover was to cover one’s home in lamb’s blood, a protective precursor before the Sacrifice of the Ultimate Lamb, Jesus Christ.

We might also say that none of this news since apostate Jews have been about this wretched behavior since the Old Testament. Certainly, we might see the obvious parallels between Jews (who also support abortion at an 85% rate) who commit blood rituals and those ancient Hebrews who sacrificed children to Moloch.

Our Talmudic enemies, who bastardize Jewish history, develop numerous inversions of both the New and Old Testament rituals. This is also neither an innocent mistake nor one without present-day consequences. As Bernard M. Smith notes:

“If true, the ‘Blood Libel’ is a terrible case in which the malefactor successfully branded the victim as the criminal. What is one to do with that knowledge? And more to the point, if Jews abducted and crucified Christian children five- and six-hundred years ago, what does that say about how Jews, even today, feel about us?”

It’s also important to notice that Passovers of Blood author Ariel Toaff (a Jewish professor) did not write his book intending to defame his brethren. However, any explication of the truth, any small semblance of it, if unflattering toward Jews, is unacceptable for the true arbiters of cancel-culture, today’s modern Pharisees.

You can learn more on this macabre subject from yet another helpful resource, where the scholar, Arnold Toynbee, likens the Jews to a Stone Age culture or a “fossil people.” He accuses them of being the only remaining civilization (if they could be called one) that still practices blood rituals.

The same article reminds us that even the esteemed Fr. Alban Butler discusses blood rituals in his masterpiece, Lives of the Saints. In it, Fr. Butler details the 15th-century accounts of how Jews devised various methods of securing Christian children for their insidious Passover rituals. So, we have it from reliable Catholic sources that Jews did indeed engage in this nefarious behavior.

Next, we Catholics should take this issue seriously because the Church, although hesitant to start conflicts with Jews, has acknowledged this problem.

The Church has all but infallibly approved the existence of blood rituals, given the case of young Simon of Trent, who suffered murder at the hands of the Jews. Catholics, at least in Trent, could venerate him (until Vatican II). Were it not for fear of creating public chaos between Catholics and Jews, Simon would have received beatification and canonization more officially.

Think of it this way. Why else did the Church ever venerate the young child (before the Vatican II ecumenist takeover) had he not received martyrdom this way? Did someone else commit his murder? If so, then whom? Do the Jews have an alternative suspect for that heinous crime?

At the end of the day, the best they can do is pass this off as “just a few rotten apples” orchestrated by renegades among their ranks.

Jewish Hypocrisy

The Jews not only deny their blood rituals and murders but also accuse their critics of “Blood Libel” anytime evidence of any other criminal behavior emerges. You may have seen this recently with the Sde Teiman leaked rape tape. All Israeli officials can do is deny, deny, deny.

Every criticism they receive is libelous, according to modern Jews. By the way, if Jews found the torturing of St. Simon’s murderers so offensive, why do they employ these same methods in their prison facilities (i.e., Sde Teiman)‌ nowadays?

Finally, consider one last note about the so-called “torturing” of Ashkenazi Jews (by Catholic/Italian authorities). One reason contemporary Jews “cancelled” Ariel Toaff so quickly is that he demonstrated the absurdity of Catholic officials knowing anything about secret rites in the first place. If they were secret rituals, how could the judges and examiners know them well enough to replicate them precisely so as to induce such tortured confessions?

“I found that there were statements and parts of the testimony that were not part of the Christian culture of the judges, and they could not have been invented or added by them,” said Toaff in an interview with Haaretz News.

In other words, the victimology of the Ashkenazi Jews, as usual, doesn’t pass the smell test.

Catholic Tolerance of Jews Despite Their Blood Rituals

I should note that the so-called “torturing” of Jews, suspected of committing blood rituals, is likely exaggerated as well. Let us recall that it is the same Catholic Church that has issued a rather lenient and semi-tolerant stance toward the Jews, notably in the landmark papal bull, Sicut Judaeis.

That bull, first issued by Pope Calixtus II, and re-affirmed by 18 subsequent pontiffs (more than ANY other Church document), forbade Catholics from countering Jewish aggressions. The Church has commanded Catholics to abstain from forced conversions, destruction of Jewish property, interference in Jewish festivals, and other physical transgressions.

Jews: Not So Peaceful Toward Catholics

Do our Talmudic adversaries grant the same clemency in as far as they treat us?

No, because they are the same brood of vipers actively plotting to inflict Noahide laws on all the “goyim,” (who they consider cattle) in the not-too-distant future. Yet again, if you wish to verify that claim, I wouldn’t waste time with the useless and contrived search results you’ll find by using Jewgle.

Then, there is yet another uncomfortable but obvious consideration we must make: do any modern Jews or elites still participate in anything resembling blood rituals?

Indeed, today’s Jew-ists, the Kabbalistic elite, continue this horrid practice by consuming adrenochrome, derived from terrified children’s blood. This is at least the testimony of the former Satanic High Priest, Zachary King, who converted to Catholicism.

He claims that Bill Gates, the trans-humanist alleged to have participated in Jewish Kabbalistic magic, indulged in adrenochrome. It would be absurd to imagine he was alone at it. Other sources accuse the Clintons and other powerful players of similar activities.

Of course, as usual, the ruling elites always deny such allegations, branding anyone who posits them with the dreaded “conspiracy theorist” label, thereby terminating any worthwhile investigation. This is their approach to every potential criticism of global Jewry, and typical Westerners abide by this, having assumed the commands of their oppressors. After all, who wants to be cursed with the dreaded “antisemitic” label?

Meanwhile, the usual suspects (Israeli leaders, Talmudic rabbis, and other world figures) advance the latest crime against humanity, the Israeli genocide in Gaza, while most observers whistle past the graveyard. There is no public accountability for this mass atrocity, especially when it’s entirely verboten to criticize the Jews for any infraction, irrespective of the magnitude.

Remember, by the way, these are the same Jews who attempt to weasel out of having crucified Jesus Himself (even to this day). They STILL adhere to this revisionist claim. You should be aware of this because obvious truth is a disputed matter nowadays, even as it hides in plain sight.

LEARN MORE: Check out this terrific video explanation of Jewish Ritual Murder by the man known as Catholic State. He details even more examples of Blood Ritual all across history.

St. Simon of Trent, Ora Pro Nobis

So, my friends, we each face a formidable decision upon reviewing this information. Who do you believe: Holy Mother Church, guided by the Holy Ghost, or our ancient adversaries, the Neo-Pharisaical Talmudic Jews?

Yes, there are plenty of sources, both for and against the existence of blood rituals, forcing us to render a judgment over the general culpability of the Jews. We need not embark on vicious witch hunts against every Jew, but no intellectually honest observer can ignore the deadly and unavoidable rift between Catholics and Talmudists. To do so would be the epitome of Pollyannaism in the face of a radically corrupted world.

Fortunately, we Catholics, who acknowledge Jesus as the Messiah, and believe everything He promised about His Church, have nothing to fear. We can begin with the position that the True Church (not today’s Anti-Church) is always correct (albeit with momentary lapses among individual judgments). We have no reason to question Her rulings, either pertaining to canonizations, dogmas/doctrines, or what She admonishes about Her enemies.

As always, we should pray the Rosary every day (all 15 decades) to facilitate the best chance of distinguishing facts from Talmudic fictions. One of the 15 Promises (associated with praying the Rosary) reminds us that this devotion protects us against heresies, including the slippery ones propagated by Jewish antagonists. Our Lady also promised “signal graces,” which help with difficult discernment, for all those who pray Her Holy Psalter.

Therefore, if you wish to withstand the oppressive psy-ops and agitations of the Jews, then remain close to the Blessed Mother. Never was it known that Mary should betray any of Her true clients. Moreover, devotion to Mary is, and always has been, a dependable sign of predestination, and likewise, all those who shun Her will procure their damnation.

St. Simon of Trent, ora pro nobis.

BONUS MATERIAL

In case you missed the news, the Jewish economist, Larry Summers, pictured below with his unsavory buddies, got caught in sexual improprieties while an economist at Harvard. This had led him to resign ‌his board position at OpenAI. Summers was previously a key figure in the bailout policies and Keynesian machinations during 2008. He’s also a favorite of the Israeli government, including Emperor Netanyahu.

This news has plenty of fascinating implications pertaining to the Epstein files (though, I wouldn’t count on any blockbuster mainstream revelations).