“Why doesn’t the SSPX consecrate new bishops? They’re going to face episcopal extinction along with the Ecclesia Dei groups!”
– Lots of People
Perhaps there’s a simple logistical answer to that question: the SSPX doesn’t have enough supply to meet the demand for an expanded traditional episcopacy.
Many times I have heard that the SSPX (also known as the “Neo-SSPX” among detractors) has a grave shortage of priests within its ranks. It possesses just enough clergy to fulfill its various missionary objectives, servicing dozens of chapels all across the land.
Since it is news that the Society wishes to consecrate new bishops soon (anywhere between two to 12 of them) we should wonder if it has sufficient priests to sustain itself while doing so. With all the analysis of this affair throughout Catholic media, I’m surprised nobody else has mentioned this practical matter.
After all, anyone who has attended an SSPX Mass has certainly heard the many pleas for the faithful to pray for new priests. The clergy mention it often, and the superior general even makes chapels pray a lengthy prayer for vocations before each Mass.
Whenever SSPX parishioners pray together before Mass, the Rosary leader prays not one but TWO prayers for this intention. Only about 10% of the congregation prays along with the lengthy prayer because it lasts forever. Most parishioners prefer the shorter prayer (“O Lord, grant us priests”).
Nevertheless, I suppose you don’t employ such heavy urgency unless your Society is in dire sacerdotal straits. Yet we all know the Society is well overdue for new bishops after the loss of Monsignors Tissier de Mallerais and Williamson.
Can the SSPX accomplish both objectives: replenishing its clerical ranks at the episcopal and priestly levels? If it intends to achieve the former, then it may have to do so by depleting the latter. That is, however, unless it recruits prelates from outside the Society or invites some of its defectors to return as priests or bishops.
My readers should be familiar with the “SSPX Resistance” and its priests, like Fr. David Hewko. What would happen if the Neo-Society (which is at odds with its resistors, obviously) got its act together and reverted to Lefebvreian traditionalism? What if it returned to its steadfast opposition to Vatican II and modernism enough to convince the SSPX Resisters to reconcile? What if it resumed its practice of conditional ordination for all the priests it helped escape the Novus Ordo? I wonder if that would get the SSPX Resistance priests to consider returning.
Now, of course, this would take a minor miracle to occur.
The divide between the Neo-SSPX and the SSPX Resistance runs rather deep, and has at least since 2012. However, a reconciliation between the two camps may be the Neo-SSPX’s only chance unless it wishes to incur an even greater dearth of clergy. Simply put, few young men desire to enter the Catholic priesthood (in any of the camps) when they cannot tell what these societies represent.
Now is the time for the beleaguered SSPX to change this decadent trajectory and stand for something: a firm opposition to Vatican II, organized Jewry, all forms of modern politics, and most importantly, the entire wicked Synodal Anti-Church in Rome.
Nothing else will do. The Society’s existential future hinges upon these issues.

I’d like to add one other comment about the SSPX’s potential cooperation with that last awful element, the Vatican Anti-Church.
It should go without saying that we must object to any prospect of Fr. Pagliarani meeting with modernist Rome for negotiation, least of all with Cardinal Smooshy Kissies. The fact that this is even on the table demonstrates the probable outcome of this whole affair. It will lead to the inevitable consecration of mediocre pseudo-traditional bishops, and/or the co-optation of Vatican-approved hirelings from the Novus Ordo hellscape.
Instead of negotiation, SSPX leadership should eschew and oppose all the apostates and sex perverts in the fake “church” in Rome. Let us say, with Ann the Fag Slayer, that traditional Catholics have no business doing diplomacy with “sodomite groomer-porn peddlers.”
Are there any other ways the SSPX could recruit new priests or bishops to its cause?
Should Diocesan TLM Priests Join the SSPX?
Another way to resolve the priest scarcity crisis would be for diocesan priests to switch their affiliation and become SSPX priests. Admittedly, I do not know the logistics and canonical red tape involved with all that, but some would suggest this as a terrific way to combat the shortage.
I even heard this in a sermon recently: “Why don’t diocesan priests join the SSPX?”
To that, I might respond: why don’t SSPX priests join the SSPX Resistance and escape the sinking Fellayan-Pagliaranian ship? One could argue that the old wineskins of the Neo-SSPX structure can no longer support the burgeoning demand for traditional chapels, and that the only way to sustain the remnant Church is to go entirely underground.
If you are either an SSPX priest or a diocesan traditionalist, have you considered going independent like priests such as Frs. Hewko, Kramer, Voigt, and others?
What do you have to lose (MY PAYCHECK!!!)?
Conclusion – Pray for the Consecration of Russia to Mary’s Immaculate Heart
You may also have heard the miserable news that the Catholic Church has seen a 75% decline in marriages over the past half-century. In fact, participation in the entire sacramental economy has experienced a depression for roughly 60 years, and for very predictable reasons.
We must comprehend that the catastrophic decline in Catholic sacraments and vocations will continue until Our Lady’s requests have been met. What are they? The Blessed Virgin Mary has asked that we pray her Holy Rosary (every day, all 15 decades), wear Her brown scapular, and devote ourselves to Her Immaculate Heart. Moreover, a valid pope (which the Church lacks at the present time) must consecrate Russia to that same Heart.
Until this happens, the spiritual beatings will continue, and all requests for priests, bishops, religious, good spouses, and anything else will reach Heaven to no avail.
May God have mercy on the SSPX and grant its members the grace of reversion back to the original zeal of Archbishop Marcel Lefebrvre, who unequivocally opposed Vatican II and the evil modern Antichurch.

Wonderful article once again Chris!
I will say, I have been to both chapels in Washington State, the one in Las Vegas (Father Scott Graves was particularly awesome!), the one in Richmond with and without Father J. Hewko, as well as the three in our state. I’ve also been to an SSPX retreat up North. I’ve encountered a lot of SSPX Priests.
I cannot recall at any time when any one of them has spoken anything favoring modernism, or even a softening of Archbishop Lefebvre’s idea of the SSPX. We celebrate the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass at the same Chapels, did I miss something here? You can just tell me face to face if you didn’t want to rehash it here.
As far as the Resistance, on one hand I can understand their position, because I had the same concern last week. I even spoke with an SSPX Priest about it. My concern was and is that the Superior General is going to be negotiating with one of Satan’s henchmen, Tuco. Any negotiations, any concessions given to Rome by the SSPX would guarantee me leaving and that’s not something I ever thought I’d hear myself say.
Even if our great Priests who are being tormented by the Bishop in Raleigh were restored to their original positions, so that they might glorify God and strive for the Salvation of Souls on a larger level, I never would have gone back because the restoration could be removed just as easily as they were removed. The SSPX is where I was going to stay until one of two Judgments! But now? I am very nervous about what will be sacrificed for these Consecrations.
This is still nearly 5 months away, the Priest was pretty positive that the SSPX would not capitulate or do anything that would harm the SSPX and her members. I have to believe that if I am going to continue to believe in the SSPX as I do. I was extremely grateful for Father Hewko’s wonderful email as well as his Homily this past Sunday. All I could think about though was, it’s better to beg for forgiveness rather than ask for permission. Save the plane tickets to Rome for something more fruitful.
It was a wonderful show of our Seminarians on Saturday and I wish you could have been there to see what is waiting for the SSPX chapels in the future. I did not take a head count but I would say at least seven of the pews on both sides were filled with Seminarians. If you pray Compline with the SSPX on youtube, you will have seen how many Seminarians there are. We can always use more but it is not as bleak as you think.
I totally understand the math you’re proposing about too many chiefs and not enough Indians. We deserve Holy Days of Obligation, first Fridays and Saturdays, and Feast Days, especially for the Saint who this wonderful Fraternal Society is named after. You know Father Hewko is trying his darndest but he can only do what his superiors allow him to do. He has other obligations which I did not realize; he is involved in school but it makes sense. A lot of them are doing at least double duty as well and taking 2 to 12 to Consecrate them as our next Bishops, leaves us with the question: who will suffer because of this vacuum?
If we don’t have Bishops though, we don’t have Priests and we don’t have chrism oils. Carrying out certain Sacraments becomes a problem. How many of the Faithful would remain so?
The bottom line: it’s a sticky situation and thank God it’s above our pay grades. The SSPX is in a unique but painful situation but the Crisis in the Church today makes these Consecrations necessary and absolutely justified without approval from anyone occupying Rome today. Pray for Father Pagliarani and the rest of our wonderful Priests.
Finally, we don’t need to lose more Priests to the Resistance and personally I would rather see a welcoming of the Marian Corps back into the fold instead of diocesan Priests coming to the SSPX. Of course there are two that I would love to see at the SSPX but that does not vouch for anyone else, including the Priest here in Greenville.
Let us pray to our Lord as well as to His wonderful Mother so that she may intercede for us. Pray for Father Bourbeau and Father Hewko that they may not be further burdened and that they never feel lonely or despair.
I will also pray for you my Friend. Just watch out for Mossad! Oy Vey!
Ave Maria!
Thomas
LikeLike
I wouldn’t say I’ve heard any particular SSPX priest announce modernist doctrine specifically, but I believe its more of a problem of ommission: not preaching against Vatican II enough. The greater problem is not with the lower-ranking clergy. It’s with the Society’s leadership, which simultaneously handcuffs its priests while playing ball with folks like Bergoglio, Prevost, Tucho, et al. I do not know for sure what will happen, but if history serves as any indicator, then Bishop Fellay’s SSPX will seek diplomacy with our enemies in the Vatican. I hope this is wrong. We’ll find out soon.
LikeLike