Bergoglio: Heretic or Undisputed Earthly King of Heresy?

Antipope Jorge Bergoglio, the obvious heretic, may require his own unique descriptor. Even “arch-heretic,” the title reserved for creeps like Luther and Calvin, doesn’t rise to sufficient heights to describe our Argentinian buddy.

I propose we refer to him as the Undisputed Earthly King of Heresy.

Why should we distinguish between a “little” or “material” heretic versus a full-blown, fire-breathing MEGA Heretic?

Bergoglio, as I intend to show, far exceeds modest heresy (material or manifest) by hating and assaulting almost every component of the faith. If we restrict our understanding of his antipapacy to “simple heresy,” then we won’t grasp the enormity of the problem.

Even great Church figures suffered occasional (usually temporary) errors. If the threshold for “heretic” is as easy to breach as we’re told, then almost all of us have tripped through it at some point. It’s almost as if it takes the majesty of the papacy to ensure total invulnerability against doctrinal error.

So, to overcome this common penchant for error, God has given us the glorious gift of his Vicar on Earth (which Bergoglio is not, and never has been). Let’s first explore why we foolish folks may need such an infallible and magisterially unitive blessing.

Many Examples of Error Among Learned Men

The Church fathers, Origen and Tertullian, were heretics and have never been canonized. However, we still use several of their writings despite their succumbing to condemned heresies, like Montanism and Origenism.

These men were only in error in one or two areas, but given their willful persistence, have been disqualified from canonization. We reference their terrific contributions on hypostasis, the nature of the trinity, and even condemnations of other heresies, but should also acknowledge their mistakes.

Jorge Bergoglio, by contrast, loves ALL the heresies (along with every demon idol imaginable). For him, it’s not about mistakes or obdurate error, for he actively seeks to suffocate and destroy every facet of Christian truth. I’ll have more on him in a moment, but let’s recall some discrepancies or dubious ideas among other revered men.

Even the most venerable Church Doctors, the ones we dignify with “saint” in front of their name, made at least some theological errors (if even just temporarily). No single Doctor, not Augustine, Aquinas, Jerome, or the rest (excluding pope doctors), enjoyed perfect dogmatic protection. God has bestowed that gift solely upon His earthly Vicar (which Bergoglio is not, and never has been).

When have certain Church doctors exhibited errors?

Aquinas didn’t anticipate the dogma of Mary’s Immaculate Conception, Augustine held many horrible views before his conversion, and Jerome was overruled by Rome on acceptance of the deuterocanonical scriptures. I don’t have enough space to go through several examples, but when in doubt, anything not approved by the Church is either wrong, dubious, or open to various interpretations.

We’re supposed to submit our understanding to the Church doctors’ teachings when they form a consensus (or continuity). Even then, it’s only upon the approval of the Vicar of Christ (which Bergoglio is not, and never has been).

Now, let us return to that imbecilic debate regarding “whether the saints agreed a pope could be a heretic.”

MANY Saints Quotations Against a Possible “Heretic Pope” 

Dr. Edmund Mazza, a genuine academic scholar (and endangered species), has done terrific work hammering the final nail into the coffin of this potential “heretic pope” lunacy. He provides several saint quotations to corroborate this in a recent article, (which you should read soon), If Francis is Pope . . .

Here are a few highlights:

• St. Robert Bellarmine: “The power of Peter’s keys does not extend to the point that the Supreme Pontiff can declare ‘not sin’ what is sin, or ‘sin’ that which is not sin. In fact, this would be to call evil good, and good evil, something that always has been and will be very far from the one who is the Head of the Church, the pillar and foundation of truth.”
• St. Thomas Aquinas: “However, the Roman Church was not corrupted by heretics because it was founded on a rock. Hence there were heretics in Constantinople, and the work of the apostles was lost; only Peter’s church remained intact (Luke 23:32). And this refers not only to the Church of Peter, but to the faith of Peter, and to the whole Western Church. Hence, I believe that the Westerners owe greater reverence to Peter than to the other apostles.”
• First Vatican Council: “For in the Apostolic See the Catholic religion has always been preserved unblemished, and sacred doctrine been held in honor…And indeed all the venerable Fathers have embraced, and the holy orthodox Doctors have venerated and followed their [Popes] apostolic doctrine; knowing most fully that this See of Saint Peter remains ever free from all blemish of error, according to the divine promise of the Lord our Saviour made to the Prince of His disciples: ‘I have prayed for thee that thy faith fail not; and when thou art converted, confirm thy brethren.”
• Pope Saint Leo IX: “By the See of the Chief of the Apostles, namely by the Roman Church, through the same Peter, as well as through his successors, have not the comments of all the heretics been disapproved, rejected, and overcome, and the hearts of the brethren in the faith of Peter — which so far neither has failed, nor up to the end will fail — been strengthened.”

Again, Dr. Mazza put together a list of 30 saint quotations elaborating the indefectibility of the Pope and Church. I encourage you to review it, bookmark it, and reference it anytime someone tells you a poacher, like Bergoglio, could get his freemasonic talons around the divinely ordained Petrine Office.

Now What About Jorge Bergoglio?

So, there we see that even a miniscule heresy is enough to disintegrate the possibility of a “Pope Francis.” An extensive list of saints have ruled against the possibility of an “erring pope.” Moreover, Bergoglio doesn’t err against theology so much as he murders it like a rampaging Godzilla heretic.

Thankfully, however, we don’t have to rely on nit-picking or various legalisms to arrive at this conclusion. Bergoglio, the Undisputed Earthly King of Heresy (at least among “flesh and blood”), offers no shortage of examples.

• Universalism – He participates in pagan ceremonies (Western Granny, Pocket Mama, et al.), sometimes inviting them into the Vatican. We saw this with his signing of the Document on Human Fraternity, establishing the Abrahamic Family House, where folks pretend Jews, Muslims, and Christians worship the same God. Although it’s impossible to reconcile non-trinitarian “religions” (notably Islam) with Catholicism, that doesn’t stop Bergo one bit.
• Amoris Laetitia – Hopefully, we all know this one by now. It’s the document where Bergoglio tried to reverse Catholic teaching on receiving communion while committing adultery. Only the antichurch’s intellectually dishonest lawyer boys even attempt to defend this hell-spawned document any longer. An alternative reading on this apostolic exhortation name may be “the joy of sodomy,” according to Ann Barnhardt and other commentators.
• Denial of Christ’s Divinity – While he hasn’t done this under any “official” capacity, he also isn’t fooling anyone. Eugenio Scalfari, a communist/atheist journalist, and Bergoglio’s “longtime friend and interlocutor,” says as much. If this is untrue, it begs the question: why would one’s friends allege something like that?
• Freemasonry – If his hand gestures don’t convince you he’s a freemason, then consider reading Fratelli Tutti, his encyclical where he uses their favorite expression “liberty, equality, and fraternity.” That’s because Bergoglio, like all true communists, is a freemason. Yes, technically this isn’t a heresy, and neither is genocide, per se, but it’s evil.
• Imprudence??? – The recent fad among “antipope-splainers,” as I dub them, is to refer to every Bergoglian antic as mere imprudence. “You can’t possibly know what he really thinks. The pope was just imprudent with . . . *fill in the blank*.” While we should avoid claims that come too close to detraction, calling everything “imprudent” is a surreptitious smokescreen. What’s next? Must we consider Diocletian just imprudent for butchering millions of Christians?
• Modernism – Since this is the synthesis of all heresies, we should assume that its greatest champion would be the Undisputed Earthly King of Heresies. So, tell me, dear reader, does modernism have any greater living advocate than Jorge B?

This just scratches the surface, too. Therefore, what would it take for the antipope-splainers to acknowledge the problem? If Bergoglio were to set fire to a crucifix and dance in a circle, perhaps you would respond “Oh well, that’s just our crazy pope, again. Move along; nothing to see here.”

Your relentless loyalty to Bergoglio isn’t “faith” or “perseverance.” It’s more like . . . being a zombie.

Heresy Super Highway with New “Cardinal” Kissy Smoochem

Speaking of Amoris Laetitia, the antichurch has just promoted one of its most bizarre villains. Antipope Bergoglio named that document’s ghostwriter, Argentinian Archbishop Victor Manuel Fernandez, as Prefect to the Dicastery of the Doctrine of the Faith.

Aside from that dreadful work, Fernandez has also graced us with classics like “Heal Me With Your Mouth: The Art of Kissing.”

For that, I call him Cardinal Kissy Smoochem, but he’s also the brains and lips behind much of Bergoglian Antichurch’s heresy super highway. Perhaps we’d call him the Joseph Goebbels of today’s perverted Vatican antichurch.

Fernandez, a proponent of condom usage in mixed marriages, has been the brains behind many antipapal publications.

• Amoris Laetitia
• Frutelli Tutti
• Laudato Si
• Evangelii Gaudium (dubbed “the communist manifesto of Francis”)

What kind of theological contributions have earned Fernandez the role of ghostwriter for Bergoglio? Well, if you’d like to regurgitate, then read his Book of Kissing.

Here’s a preview (bold emphasis, mine):

You don’t notice, inattentive. Your lips murder. Your eyes don’t notice, distracted, the wandering eyes that are preoccupied before the divine flesh of your mouth. And you pensively miss with that open mouth, while behind you remain the raving lunatics. Come on down, my dear, before you awaken suddenly someone desperate with a terrible hickey. How was God so cruel as to give you that mouth… There is no one who resists me, witch, hide it.

There’s some dispute about certain Spanish translation aspects. This regards whether he meant “witch” or “bitch.” Either way, it’s semi-erotic, composed by a 30-something priest, intended for a child (teenage) audience. There’s scarcely any scriptural reference, he mumbles a few things about Jansenism, a few others about Freud, and includes several pagan poetry examples. If you decide to explore that link, don’t let young family members look at the pictures.

Bonus Viewing: Check out Cardinal Kissy Smoochem’s “pectoral cross” below. It’s the same Osiris one that his master, Bergo, wears everywhere. You can also view this picture gallery to see several prelates enjoying that pagan, blasphemous monstrosity.

Concluding Comments on The Papacy (Real Pope = Real Love of God)

Finally, let’s revisit that quotation from St. Thomas Aquinas regarding St. Peter.

St. Thomas’ quotation (see above) demonstrates the primacy of Peter over the other apostles. Notice as well how St. Peter’s relationship with God is much deeper than banal legalism, theology, or philosophy. Rather, it’s a genuine love for Our Lord. People who lampoon St. Peter’s errors or weaknesses (as I’ve often heard) refuse to credit him for his tremendous acts of faith and charity.

Tremendous Faith – Matthew 16

The beginning of love is faith, and we see that so beautifully in St. Peter’s acknowledgement of Jesus as the Christ, and Son of the Living God, in Matthew 16. Like Abraham (willing to offer his son), God tested his faith during a crisis, after so many others abandoned Jesus at Capharnaum. Here, St. Peter heard God, but wasn’t forced to obey. It took cooperation with the Holy Spirit, and genuine faith, to say what he said.

Repentance After Betrayal

Although popes do not err, they sin just like the rest of us fallen men. We know many examples, including from St. Peter (denying Our Lord three times, disaputing the coming of His passion, and so forth). However, St. Peter’s tremendous love for Jesus ultimately transcends all of those sins. We see this through his willingness to undo his error by promising three times to feed Our Lord’s sheep, hence accepting his responsibility as a shepherd and fisher of men.

Final Perseverance in Rome

Final Perseverance in Rome

Toward the end of his life, St. Peter fearfully fled Rome before encountering Our Lord on the Appian Way. While escaping the imperial capital, he saw Jesus once again carrying a cross, asking him Domine, Quo Vadis? (Lord, where are you going?). If St. Peter would have abandoned his duty to die in Rome, Our Lord would have had to suffer a second passion. Then, finally realizing what Our Lord meant by “lead thee whither thou wouldst not,” St. Peter reversed course, with replenished courage, and embraced his crucifixion.

What motivated Peter to accept his destiny? It was the same motivating fire, burning through Our Lord’s Sacred Heart while dying on the cross: true love. Heretics can only possess this once they relinquish their heresy.

Thus we have a sampling of St. Peter’s many great deeds, to say nothing of other supernatural feats (recorded in Acts of the Apostles), and multiple edifying epistles. So, let us ignore those who hate the true beauty of the papacy, and its blessed first occupant. Don’t forget to pray the Rosary every day, say the Confiteor with gusto while praying Compline, asking for the intercession of the apostles, Peter and Paul, and . . . 

. . . Say “No” to Bergo’s ridiculous and massively heretical regime, including Cardinal Kissy Smoochem.